By Ingrid "Shortwave" Frost
President Trump says he pulled back a "massive attack" on Iran over the weekend and is now floating new negotiations to begin Monday, "in the form of a negotiation," according to his own account of events.
It is a familiar rhythm. Trump has said before that a deal to end hostilities with Iran was close, only for strikes to resume days later. This time, by his telling, the attack was ready and he stood it down instead.
One problem: Iran hasn't said yes. As of this writing, Tehran has not responded publicly to Trump's suggestion that talks are imminent, leaving open the question of whether Monday produces a negotiating table or another round of the same standoff.
The stakes here are not abstract. A resumed air campaign against Iran would ripple through oil markets, shipping lanes and a region already stretched thin by the war in Gaza. A real negotiation, if it happens, could be the first concrete off-ramp in months. But readers have been here before with this administration's Iran messaging, and the gap between announcement and outcome has been wide.
What's confirmed: Trump's own statements calling off the strike and proposing Monday talks. What's not confirmed: Iran's participation, the substance of any deal, or whether "close to a negotiated end" means anything more this time than it has in the past.
FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -
— Compiled from reporting by BBC World and Al Jazeera.
The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."