Korean Retail Traders Nurse Losses After Chip Stock Rout, Minister Apologizes
Leveraged bets gone wrong put a spotlight on rule changes that opened the door to bigger risk
By Barnaby "Bottom-Line" Coyne
Somewhere in Seoul this week, a lot of retail investors are staring at brokerage apps they'd rather not open.
According to CNBC, Korean retail investors have racked up heavy losses from leveraged bets on stocks, after a rout in chip stocks hit the market hard. The losses followed rule changes earlier this year that made it easier to take on leveraged positions — bets that amplify gains, but just as easily amplify pain.
A government minister has apologized over the losses, per CNBC's reporting, though the outlet's account does not name the minister, detail the rule change, or put a figure on the total sum lost — details worth watching for as this story develops.
Here's the plain version: leveraged ETFs let ordinary investors multiply their exposure to a stock index or sector without borrowing directly from a broker. They work great on the way up. On the way down, they work just as efficiently in reverse. When chip stocks — long a source of national pride and pension-fund returns in a country whose economy leans hard on semiconductors — went into a slide, the leverage did what leverage does.
What's not yet clear from the available reporting is which rule changes are being blamed, or whether regulators plan to tighten them again. Nor do we know how many households are affected, or whether this is contained to sophisticated day-traders or has crept into the retirement savings of ordinary Koreans.
What is clear: when a government minister feels compelled to apologize publicly for market losses, it usually means the losses reached people who didn't think they were gambling. We'll keep watching for the numbers behind the apology.
Somebody's paying for this. Let's find out who.
— Compiled from reporting by CNBC.
The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."