By Barnaby "Bottom-Line" Coyne
California has walked away from settlement talks with Paramount over its proposed $111 billion merger with Warner Bros. Attorney General Rob Bonta says Paramount leaked and misrepresented what was actually discussed behind closed doors.
Bonta isn't a lone objector. He's leading a coalition of 12 states that have already sued to block the deal outright. That's a serious legal roadblock for a merger of this size — one that would combine two of Hollywood's biggest content libraries and, depending on how regulators see it, reshape how much choice and how much price competition remains in film, television and streaming.
The breakdown over leaked talks is its own story. When settlement negotiations spill into public view — accurately or not — it tends to poison the well for the compromise both sides may have wanted to avoid the courtroom. Paramount now heads toward litigation with one of its largest state antagonists no longer willing to talk, at least for now.
What's still unclear from what's been reported: exactly what was allegedly leaked, and whether Paramount disputes Bonta's characterization of it. Readers deserve those specifics before drawing firm conclusions about who broke faith first.
For now, the deal's fate sits with judges, not negotiators — and a merger this size touches everyone from studio employees to cable subscribers who'll eventually foot the bill for however this shakes out.
Somebody's paying for this. Let's find out who.
— Compiled from reporting by The New York Times.
The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."