By Ada "Peer-Review" Sparks
It looks like a doodle a kid might make waiting for a bus: a stick figure, a few absurd flourishes, the kind of image that spreads across TikTok and Instagram captioned in nonsense Italian. But according to reporting by NPR, the ownership of that doodle — part of the sprawling "Italian brainrot" meme genre — is now the subject of a legal battle that could set precedent for a much bigger question: can anyone actually own an AI-generated character?
The genre, built on absurdist AI-generated creatures with invented Italian-ish names, has become a genuine internet phenomenon over the past year, spawning fan art, merchandise and endless remixes. But U.S. copyright law has, so far, been skeptical of granting protection to works generated primarily by artificial intelligence rather than human hands. The U.S. Copyright Office has repeatedly held that copyright requires human authorship — a position that leaves purely AI-generated images in a legal gray zone.
NPR's reporting frames the dispute as a test case: if a creator can show enough human creative input — prompting, editing, curating, arranging — do they gain enough authorship to claim ownership over the resulting character, even if a machine did the rendering? The outcome could ripple well beyond meme culture, touching everything from AI-assisted illustration to synthetic media used in advertising and film.
For now, the case remains unresolved, and NPR's report does not indicate a ruling or timeline. That uncertainty is itself the story: an entire economy of AI-generated content is being built on copyright ground nobody has yet mapped.
Extraordinary claims. Ordinary evidence? Then no.
— Compiled from reporting by NPR News.
The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."