The water came down the valley with no warning, witnesses said, and it did not stop for villages.

A glacial collapse high in the Himalayas triggered a catastrophic flash flood along the Nepal-Tibet border this week, killing at least 165 people and sweeping away entire populated areas, according to Nepali and Chinese officials. Nearly 1,500 people remain missing, authorities said Thursday — the majority of them tourists, including trekkers and pilgrims from India, the United States, Britain, Australia and Canada drawn to a region long popular for its mountain routes.

Rescue teams are working through the wreckage of villages that officials say were simply erased by the surge. The death toll, standing at 165 as of the latest count, is expected to climb as search crews reach more remote areas cut off by the flooding.

Officials have not yet given a full accounting of how the glacial collapse occurred or whether warming temperatures played a role, though such collapses are consistent with patterns scientists have documented in a warming Himalayan range. Governments with citizens in the region — India, the U.S., U.K., Australia and Canada among them — have not released final counts of their missing nationals.

For now, the numbers are moving targets: a death toll that officials themselves say will rise, and a missing list that dwarfs it. What is certain is scale — a disaster that hit a mountain corridor built for foot traffic and small villages, with no infrastructure suited to catastrophe on this order.

Search and rescue operations continue.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by Al Jazeera and The Guardian.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

Inside Iran, a debate is running hot over the country's oldest bargaining chip: the Strait of Hormuz. The office of the supreme leader has called the strait "the pillar of Iran's new security order," comparing its strategic value to possessing a nuclear weapon, according to the Guardian. But the Guardian's reporting from inside Tehran describes what it characterizes as a growing camp of officials who argue that value is fast eroding, as Gulf neighbors build pipelines to route oil around the chokepoint altogether — leaving Iran's negotiators with a shrinking window to cut a deal before foreign exchange reserves run dry. The Guardian does not name or number these officials; the size and shape of this camp is the paper's own characterization, not an independently counted fact, and readers should weigh it as such.

Meanwhile, Al Jazeera reports Tehran's public posture is closer to defiance than concession: Iran is betting that global economic fallout from a confrontation, combined with Republican anxiety over the midterms, will eventually force President Trump to back down — a game one Al Jazeera analysis bluntly called "chicken." That bet sits uneasily against the internal warnings the Guardian describes; the two accounts suggest Iran's own government is not of one mind about how much time it has.

One concrete hedge: Al Jazeera reports a senior Iranian official says Tehran and Oman have agreed a new temporary shipping route through Hormuz, with both the entry and part of the exit running through Iranian territorial waters — a technical arrangement whose full purpose was not detailed by the source. This account of the Tehran-Oman route rests on a single unnamed Iranian official cited by Al Jazeera; the source's reason for anonymity was not stated, and the Press could not independently confirm the arrangement.

Washington, for its part, has leaned on the threat of secondary sanctions — penalizing third countries that keep trading with Iran — a tool Al Jazeera notes the US has used before to squeeze a sanctioned state's remaining partners.

What happens next depends on which camp in Tehran wins the internal argument. Neither the Guardian nor Al Jazeera reports a resolution.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE –

— Compiled from reporting by The Guardian and Al Jazeera.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

A fire broke out before dawn Wednesday in the newborn nursery of the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, a major government hospital in Islamabad, killing at least 14 infants, hospital officials and the government said. Al Jazeera, citing Geo News, put the toll as high as 15. Only one child was pulled out alive.

Details on the cause were not immediately available. The government has ordered an immediate inquiry, according to NPR News, which reported the blaze erupted early Wednesday in the nursery ward.

The discrepancy in the death toll — 14 versus 15, depending on the outlet — reflects the confusion common in the first hours after a mass-casualty disaster, before hospitals and officials finish accounting for every patient. Readers should expect the final number to be confirmed, and possibly revised, as the inquiry proceeds.

No further details on the newborns' identities, the ward's staffing at the time of the fire, or the building's fire-safety equipment have been reported by the sources available. Those are the questions the ordered inquiry will need to answer, and this desk will follow up as Pakistani authorities release findings.

A hospital nursery is supposed to be the safest room in the building. For 14 families in Islamabad this week, it was the opposite. That gap — between what a maternity ward promises and what happened Wednesday — is the story the inquiry now has to explain.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE –

— Compiled from reporting by NPR News and Al Jazeera, citing Geo News.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

Sudan's army is closing in on what looks like a battlefield win over the Rapid Support Forces, the paramilitary group it has fought since 2023. But two dispatches from the ground this week suggest victory over one enemy is only clearing space for others.

According to Al Jazeera's reporting, the army's gains rest on an armed coalition of allied factions it has leaned on to do the fighting — and may struggle to control once the RSF, the common enemy holding that coalition together, is gone. That is the quiet warning inside the celebration: coalitions built to defeat someone often come apart once he's defeated.

The fragmentation is already visible in South Kordofan. The Sudan Doctors Network, a medical monitoring group, says fighters from the SPLM-N — a rebel movement separate from the RSF — killed 27 people in attacks there, including four children. That single tally, from one advocacy group, has not been independently verified by other observers, and this article treats it as such.

What's clear without dispute: Sudan's war has never been a simple two-sided fight. It has always been a patchwork of militias, ethnic armies and regional proxies, loosely aligned against whichever side looked ascendant. The RSF's likely defeat removes the war's main organizing conflict but leaves every other fault line — Kordofan among them — exposed and unresolved.

For the families in South Kordofan, and for the roughly 12 million Sudanese the UN says have been displaced since the war began, the distinction between one war ending and another beginning is mostly academic. The guns don't know the difference.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE –

— Compiled from reporting by Al Jazeera and the Sudan Doctors Network.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

KYIV — The United Kingdom has agreed to share classified technical details for British-made components of the SCALP long-range missile, letting Ukraine begin assembling the weapons itself, according to NPR News. The announcement came as Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham visited Kyiv for Ukraine's Independence Day, renewing British support for the country's war effort.

The defense firm MBDA, which makes the SCALP, will release the details on the UK-made parts, NPR reported. It's a shift from simply supplying finished missiles to helping Ukraine build its own — the kind of move that raises the stakes for everyone involved, not least the people who'll be on the receiving end.

Moscow noticed. A Kremlin adviser told BBC Newsnight that UK drone factories could face attacks "from unknown sources" — language vague enough to deny, specific enough to threaten. The comment landed directly after Britain's missile announcement, though the BBC did not report the adviser's name in the segment as summarized here, a gap worth flagging for readers who want the receipts.

The Guardian's Luke Harding, who has covered Ukraine's war since the start, has been reporting this week on both Burnham's Kyiv visit and what the paper described as Russia's "loudening threats to Britain." Harding has also written recently about Ukraine's increasingly effective drone strikes on Russian targets — a sign the war's technological edge keeps shifting.

None of this settles the war. It does mean the line between supplying Ukraine and being a target keeps getting thinner, and London just moved it again.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE —

— Compiled from reporting by NPR News, BBC World, and The Guardian.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

Andy Burnham stepped off the plane in Kyiv on Monday, marking his first foreign trip as UK prime minister with a visit timed to Ukraine's independence day. He arrived alongside a number of European leaders as the so-called "coalition of the willing" gathered to discuss what allies are calling a persistent shortfall in Ukrainian air defences.

According to reporting from the Guardian's live European coverage, Burnham is expected to announce British support for France in setting up assembly lines for long-range missiles, part of a broader push to keep weapons flowing to Kyiv as the war grinds into another year. The BBC reports the visit comes after Moscow warned of "consequences" over the reported use of British-made drones by Ukrainian forces — a warning that underscores how directly London has now inserted itself into the conflict's hardware.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is using the gathering to press allies on the air defence gap, as Al Jazeera reports Ukraine and Russia continue to trade drone attacks even as the diplomats meet. Neither the scale of the missile assembly-line plan nor a timeline has been independently detailed beyond what officials have said publicly, and readers should treat troop and equipment figures cited by either side with caution — wartime claims from Kyiv and Moscow alike have not been independently verified here.

What's certain is the symbolism: a new British prime minister choosing Kyiv, not Washington or Brussels, for his first trip abroad. Whether that translates into missiles on a production line — or just another photo alongside Zelenskyy — will be the test in the weeks ahead.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE —

— Compiled from reporting by The Guardian, the BBC and Al Jazeera.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

Mohsen Rezaei did not mince words in his first interview since taking over Iran's supreme national security council. Any neighboring state that joins Washington's tightening economic pressure campaign against Tehran, he told state television, will be "considered an enemy," and Iran "will target their interests."

The hardliner's remarks, reported by The Guardian, came as President Donald Trump pushed what Iranian officials are calling an "economic D-Day" — a campaign to squeeze Iran's economy that Trump has paired with what The Guardian describes as his "fanciful view" that the Strait of Hormuz constitutes new US territory. Rezaei said Iran would target oil-shipping routes out of the Gulf that serve as alternatives to Hormuz if regional states line up behind the US effort.

Al Jazeera reporting corroborates the threat, noting Tehran has promised "tit-for-tat" action against any country that joins the pressure campaign, and that Iranian officials frame any cooperating neighbor's assets as fair targets for retaliation.

What's unproven here is the operational reality behind the rhetoric — whether Iran has the capacity or the intent to follow through on strikes against shipping lanes or foreign interests, as opposed to using the threat as leverage in advance of further US sanctions moves. Rezaei's statement is exactly that: a statement, from a government with every incentive to project strength as its economy tightens.

Still, the words matter. Gulf states balancing US pressure against their own trade with Iran now have a direct threat on record, in a region where shipping lanes are the arteries of the global oil market.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE —

— Compiled from reporting by The Guardian and Al Jazeera.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

The blast came just after dawn. A bomb hidden in a rubbish bin tore through a quiet residential square in Russian-occupied Sevastopol on August 13, killing Robert Shageev, deputy commander of a Black Sea fleet submarine brigade, as he walked past in naval uniform. The device held roughly 500 grams of TNT equivalent — enough to kill him instantly.

Russian authorities have accused Margarita Reutt, described by those who know her as an unremarkable woman, of planting the bomb. According to reporting by The Guardian, friends close to Reutt say they are struggling to reconcile the charge with the person they knew, though some recall a stubborn determination in her that could see a plan through to the end.

Shageev himself was no ordinary target in the telling of Ukrainian and Russian accounts: he is described as a defector, complicating the narrative around both victim and accused. The details of how Reutt was identified, what evidence ties her to the bombing, and what her defense might argue have not been fully aired in public reporting, and The American Times has not independently verified the Russian account of her alleged role.

The killing lands amid a string of high-profile attacks on Russian military and naval figures in occupied Crimea, a pattern that has unsettled the peninsula's Russian-installed administration and fed suspicion of Ukrainian intelligence involvement — suspicion Kyiv has neither confirmed nor denied in this case.

What is confirmed: a man in uniform is dead, a woman faces accusation, and a residential square in Sevastopol now carries the scar of a war that keeps finding new ways to reach civilians far from any front line.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE —

— Compiled from reporting by The Guardian.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

The numbers coming out of Somalia are the kind that are supposed to trigger alarm bells, and according to UNICEF, they have: a 32 percent jump in the number of children being treated for severe malnutrition, in a country already gripped by drought.

The UN agency links the deepening crisis directly to cuts in humanitarian aid — funding reductions that have coincided with, and by UNICEF's account contributed to, the worsening of a hunger emergency for the country's youngest and most vulnerable. Somalia has weathered repeated drought cycles in recent years, each one straining a health and food system with limited capacity to absorb shocks.

Available reporting does not specify which donors or programs were cut, nor does it detail the current total caseload beyond the percentage increase — figures that would help readers judge the full scale of the emergency. What is documented is the direction of travel: more children arriving at treatment centers with severe malnutrition, at a moment when the resources meant to catch them are shrinking rather than growing.

Malnutrition in early childhood carries consequences that outlast the crisis itself — stunted growth, weakened immune systems, developmental setbacks that can follow a child for life. That is the quiet arithmetic behind a single statistic: a jump measured in percentage points is, on the ground, a jump measured in individual children too weak to fight off illnesses that shouldn't be lethal.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by Al Jazeera, citing UNICEF.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

The shopping centre in Kryvyi Rih was doing what shopping centres do on a Friday — people buying groceries, running errands — when Russian drones slammed into it. Sixteen people were killed, according to The Guardian's reporting on the strike.

The city is President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's hometown, and he called the strike "cynical and despicable." The European Union's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, went further, describing it as "terror by design" and announcing she would put forward what she called the most far-reaching package of Russia sanctions since the war began, when EU foreign ministers meet in Ireland next month.

This account of the strike and death toll rests on a single Guardian report; the Press could not independently confirm the figures. There is no independent confirmation offered in available reporting of Russia's stated military rationale, if any, for the strike, nor of a Russian government response to the casualty toll. What is documented is the death count as reported and the reactions from Kyiv and Brussels. Kallas's promise of sanctions is, for now, a promise — the specifics of what a "far-reaching" package would include have not yet been detailed publicly, and sanctions packages have a long history of being announced with more force than they are ultimately enforced.

The attack adds one more entry to a war now well into its third year, one where the targeting of civilian infrastructure — shopping centres, apartment blocks, energy grids — has become a recurring, grim feature rather than an aberration. For a family in Kryvyi Rih, that pattern offers no comfort tonight.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by The Guardian.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

The deadline came and went at midnight, and with it went the last chance for a deal. Early Saturday, the United States imposed 50 percent tariffs on $20 billion worth of Canadian products, after three days of extended negotiations broke down without an agreement.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney did not mince words. "Last-minute changes in the US proposed terms were unfair, uneconomic, and called into question the reliability of any deal," he said in a statement. Carney vowed that Canada would match the US levies "dollar for dollar" — a direct hit to a trading relationship that has for decades been one of the most integrated in the world.

The breakdown caps a stretch of on-again, off-again talks between the two governments, and it lands at a moment when tariff threats out of Washington have already rattled trading partners on several continents. For Canadian exporters, the new 50 percent rate applies to a specific slice of goods worth $20 billion — not the entirety of the two countries' trade, but a substantial and immediate cost that businesses on both sides of the border will now have to absorb or pass on.

What happens next is unclear. Retaliatory tariffs take time to design and implement, and neither side has laid out precisely which products will be targeted or when. What is clear is that a deal both governments said they wanted did not happen, and the public explanations — "unfair," "last-minute changes" — leave plenty unsaid about what actually broke down at the table. Marion readers buying anything with a Canadian supply chain, from lumber to auto parts, may eventually feel this one at the register.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by The Guardian, the BBC, NPR News and Al Jazeera.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

Three hundred kilometers out over open water, Russian missiles found their marks Thursday — and Tokyo took notice.

Russia's Pacific fleet said it fired Bastion surface-to-ship missiles from Etorofu, the largest island in a chain Moscow calls the Kuril Islands and Japan calls its Northern Territories, simulating an attack on enemy vessels, the Guardian reports. All targets, roughly 300 kilometers out, were hit.

Japan criticized the drills, which came just a week after Russian President Vladimir Putin visited the disputed islands himself, according to the Guardian's account. The territory has been a sore point between Moscow and Tokyo since the closing days of World War Two, when Soviet forces seized the islands from Japan — a dispute that has kept the two nations from ever signing a formal peace treaty.

Neither Moscow nor Tokyo appears eager to let the argument rest. For Russia, the islands anchor its Pacific military posture. For Japan, they remain unfinished business from a war that ended eighty-one years ago. The missile test, coming so soon after a presidential visit, reads less like routine drills and more like a message — one Tokyo says it received loud and clear.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by The Guardian.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

For three decades, they lit candles in Victoria Park to remember the dead of June 4, 1989. This week, a Hong Kong court called that remembrance a crime.

Lee Cheuk-yan, 69, and Chow Hang-tung, 41, leaders of the now-disbanded Hong Kong Alliance, were found guilty of "incitement to subversion" under the 2020 national security law Beijing imposed on the city, the Guardian reports. A press summary handed to reporters said the pair had incited others "to organise, plan, commit or participate in acts by unlawful means with a view to subverting the state power."

The Alliance had organized the annual vigil marking China's deadly crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in Tiananmen Square. The BBC reports three activists in total were accused of inciting others under the law. An allied activist group called the verdict the product of a "twisted" judicial system that had decided the pair's guilt long before the trial began, according to Al Jazeera.

The case lands squarely in a pattern watched closely by human rights groups: Hong Kong's national security law, sold by Beijing as a tool against terrorism and foreign interference, increasingly used against acts of public memory and dissent. Critics call the conviction a marker of how far the city's promised freedoms — guaranteed for fifty years after the 1997 handover — have eroded in just six.

Sentencing details were not available in the source reporting.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by The Guardian, BBC World, and Al Jazeera.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

Thirty families moved into a resettled West Bank outpost this week, calling themselves pioneers. Israeli officials framed the return as the fulfillment of national purpose. The Palestinians who live nearby called it something else: the ground shifting under them, fast.

According to the BBC, the settlement's re-establishment defies mounting international protest and comes amid a wave of nationalist sentiment inside Israel's government. Nearby Palestinian residents told the outlet they are afraid of what comes next.

They have reason to watch closely. A report by the Israeli human rights group Yesh Din, shared with the Guardian, found that violent settler attacks in the two West Bank zones under direct Palestinian Authority control — Areas A and B, drawn up under the 1995 Oslo accords — have nearly doubled since 2025. Almost two-thirds of all settler violence recorded so far in 2026 has occurred in those very areas, land explicitly set aside for Palestinian self-rule and, eventually, statehood.

The Guardian describes this as part of a self-proclaimed "great settlement revolution" — settlers moving the fight from the territory Israel already controls into the heart of what a future Palestinian state would need to survive.

None of this happens in a vacuum. Oslo drew lines nobody expected to hold forever, and for thirty years both sides have tested them. What's different now, per Yesh Din's numbers, is where the pressure is landing — not at the edges, but in the core.

[Note to editor: This report draws on one human rights organization's data, shared exclusively with the Guardian; independent verification of the figures was not available at press time.]

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by BBC World and The Guardian.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

DHAKA — For the first time in 35 years, Bangladeshis had an actual choice on their presidential ballot Thursday — a small fact that says a great deal about how unusual the country's politics have been.

Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, the nominee of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, is facing off against Oli Ahmed, a former army officer running as the nominee of an 11-party alliance led by the Jamaat-e-Islami, according to Al Jazeera. Bangladesh's presidency has for decades been effectively settled without real contest, making this vote a notable break from form.

The election arrives against the backdrop of a country still working through the political turbulence that followed the ouster of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, whose Awami League government fell amid mass protests. The details of how the current caretaker arrangement led to this contest, and what powers the winner will actually hold, were not spelled out in the available reporting — worth flagging for readers who want the fuller institutional picture.

What's certain is the symbolism: a contested presidential race, however narrow the field, is a departure for a political system long dominated by two entrenched camps. Whether it signals a genuine opening or a one-off is a question Dhaka's next government will have to answer.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by Al Jazeera.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

El OBEID, Sudan — Sudan's war has a new front, and civilians are paying for it the way they always do: by walking away from home with whatever they can carry.

The United Nations says more than 200,000 people have been newly displaced in Sudan's Kordofan region as fighting intensifies, with power and water infrastructure in El Obeid now coming under direct attack, according to Al Jazeera. The details on exactly who controls what ground, and how the infrastructure strikes are being carried out, remain thin in initial reporting — a gap worth naming rather than papering over.

What is clear is the scale of the exodus. Sudan's civil war, now well into its third year, has already produced one of the world's largest displacement crises, uprooting millions from Khartoum, Darfur and beyond. Kordofan's collapse adds another wave to a catastrophe that has largely fallen out of the daily headlines even as it grinds on.

Aid agencies operating in the region have repeatedly warned that attacks on water and power systems compound the humanitarian toll well beyond the immediate violence, cutting off hospitals, pumping stations and food storage. This report is based on a single wire account; further detail on casualty figures, the parties responsible for the infrastructure strikes, and the UN's response was not available at time of filing.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by Al Jazeera.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

KYIV — The sirens went off in the dark, and by morning the count was grim: at least eight dead, dozens wounded, apartment blocks and a medical facility torn open across three districts of the capital.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Russia had been planning the assault for a long time, combining different types of missiles in what Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko called "a massive enemy attack." Klitschko said 18 people were hospitalized as emergency crews worked through the wreckage; city military authorities put the toll at five dead and 23 wounded in Kyiv alone, with the broader regional count reaching eight dead and more than two dozen injured, according to figures relayed by Ukrainian officials to the BBC and Al Jazeera.

The strikes hit residential buildings, warehouses and an educational institution, officials said. "The capital is recovering from a massive enemy attack," Klitschko said in a video posted to Telegram, as cleanup and rescue operations continued into Thursday.

The attack lands as Zelenskyy faces mounting pressure at home over the war's direction, even as Kyiv keeps insisting any peace on Moscow's terms would be no peace at all. Separately, the BBC reports that Ukrainian-born men captured while fighting for Russia are now being tried for treason in Kyiv-controlled territory — some insisting, in interviews from a POW camp, that they believed they were defending their homeland. It's a reminder that this war still runs through families as much as front lines.

Exact casualty figures varied slightly between Ukrainian officials and international outlets Thursday morning; this account reflects the most recent figures available at time of filing and may be updated as authorities finalize their toll.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by The Guardian, the BBC and Al Jazeera.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

Attackers moved through a village in Nigeria's central Plateau state door to door, killing at least 25 people, Al Jazeera reported. The report gives no further detail on who carried out the attack or why — a gap worth naming plainly, since Plateau state has for years seen recurring violence tied to disputes over land and grazing between farming and herding communities, without any single, tidy explanation fitting every incident.

Plateau sits in Nigeria's Middle Belt, a patchwork of ethnic and religious communities where local clashes have repeatedly turned lethal. Attacks described as "house to house" — methodical, not opportunistic — have become a grim pattern in the region, though the identity and motive of this particular group of attackers was not specified in the available reporting.

Nigerian authorities have periodically pledged tougher security responses to Plateau violence, including troop deployments and curfews, with mixed results. Villages in the affected areas often lack the police presence to deter organized attacks, and residents have repeatedly said past promises of protection came too late or not at all.

No casualty figures beyond the reported 25 dead, no arrests, and no claim of responsibility were available at time of writing. [Further detail on the attackers, the specific village, and any government response awaits additional reporting.]

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by Al Jazeera.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

The Ulchi Freedom Shield exercise, the annual test of the US-South Korea alliance's muscle, is getting a haircut. Seoul confirmed this week that the drill's run has been cut from 11 days to five, at Washington's request, the BBC reported.

The move follows President Trump's decision to scale back joint exercises, which he has tied to a "very good" relationship with North Korea's Kim Jong Un and a stated interest in reviving direct talks. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung has long pushed for a lighter military posture toward the North alongside repeated peace overtures — overtures Pyongyang has so far rejected, largely over Seoul's insistence on denuclearization, according to the Guardian.

On paper, Trump has handed Lee something he wanted. In practice, the mood in Seoul is uneasy, the Guardian reports, with officials in "some quarters" alarmed rather than relieved. A smaller drill footprint raises the old question of whether Washington's commitment to the peninsula is loosening even as North Korea's nuclear program continues.

Analysts cited by Al Jazeera are skeptical the gesture will do what Washington hopes: pry Kim away from his deepening reliance on China. Pyongyang's economic and military ties to Beijing have only grown, and a shorter US-South Korea drill schedule is unlikely by itself to change that math.

What's confirmed: the drill is shorter, at the White House's request, and South Korea says so on the record. What's contested is what it buys anyone. Trump has offered no firm date for talks with Kim; Kim has offered no public response at all.

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by the BBC, Al Jazeera and the Guardian.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."

Early Tuesday, Israeli warplanes hit an air base in northwest Syria. Israel said the goal was blunt: stop Turkish troops from setting up there. Turkey has close ties to the Syrian government and has been helping its military rebuild.

Damascus did not take it quietly. Syrian officials called the strikes "an unjustified act of aggression" that put regional security at risk, according to Al Jazeera. The base sits in territory where Turkish and Israeli interests have been colliding for months, each side wary of the other gaining a foothold as Syria's post-war order takes shape.

The United States, for its part, did not back Israel's move. A US statement condemned what it called an "unnecessary escalation," the BBC reported — a rare public daylight between Washington and Jerusalem on a Syria strike.

The episode lands in a region already crowded with competing patrons. Turkey has spent the past year positioning itself as a security partner to Syria's new government. Israel has repeatedly used air power to enforce red lines near its northern border, hitting targets it deems threats regardless of who put them there. Now the two US allies are pulling in different directions over the same stretch of Syrian territory, with Washington caught trying to referee.

What happens next depends on whether Turkey presses ahead with any deployment plans despite the strike, and whether Israel is prepared to hit Syrian soil again to stop it. Neither government has signaled it's backing down. [Further detail on casualties or damage from the strike was not available in the reporting reviewed for this article.]

FILED FROM SOMEWHERE WITH BAD COFFEE -

— Compiled from reporting by NPR News and the BBC.

The American Times' desks are written under standing pen names; the reporting under every byline meets the paper's sourcing standards. See "About Our Bylines."